RIM Process

With the Polyurethane Reaction Injection Molding Process – the Reaction Makes All the Difference!

Plastic injection molding has almost the same name, so even experienced engineers and designers might think they are the same. But “reaction” signals a big difference. Unlike plastic injection molding, the polyurethane reaction injection molding process, or RIM molding techniques, utilize low-viscosity liquid polymers in thermoset – not thermoplastic or thermoforming – processes. Through a variety of chemical reactions, these polymers expand, thicken, and harden only after they’re injected into the heated mold, accommodating much more intricate designs than ordinary plastic injection molding.

Raw materials and polyurethane reaction techniques can be selected and even customized to precisely deliver desired weight, strength, density, and hardness characteristics. The result is large polyurethane parts with a much lighter weight than those created by more commonplace processes.

Play Button

A 360 View of RIM Products & Parts

RIM Molding Chemistries, Pressures, and Temperatures

Since these liquid polymers require less pressure (~100 psi) and lower temperatures (~90°) than typical ingredients, they can be injected into cost-efficient aluminum molds, lowering tooling costs. The molds are then moderately heated (~190°), but the resulting exothermic reaction quickly brings the materials to (~325°) and promptly cures the part inside the mold.

Structural Foam RIM (94V-0)

A closed-cell polyurethane two-part chemical system that uses a chemical blowing agent to create a cellular structure within the material. Provides unique properties, including high strength-to-weight ratios, thermal insulation, and sound deadening.

Shore Hardness: 66D – 81D

Tensile Strength: 3,100 – 4,800

Flex Modulus: 160,000 – 240,000

Min. Wall Thickness: .250”

 

Flexible Foam RIM

Integral skin foam forms a dense outer layer (or skin) during the foaming process. The skin provides a durable, non-porous, and aesthetically pleasing finish

Shore Hardness: 18 – 45A

Solid (“Rigid”) RIM (94V-0)

Rigid RIM produces high-quality, lightweight, and strong plastic parts with complex geometries with high strength-to-weight ratios, durability, and precision.

Shore Hardness: 75D

Tensile Strength: 7,000

Flex Modulus: 290,000

Min. Wall Thickness: .125”

Elastomeric RIM

Elastomeric systems produce plastic parts with excellent mechanical properties, including high elasticity, strength, flexibility, durability, and high impact resistance.

Shore Hardness: 65D – 71D

Tensile Strength: 3,700 – 7,000

Flex Modulus: 50,000 – 200,000

Min. Wall Thickness: .125”

 

DCPD

Though DCPD is NOT polyurethane, the material is processed using the same RIM process to produce parts that can replace materials from steel to composites. The system balances strength and toughness with excellent resistance to harsh chemicals and hot, wet environments.

Shore Hardness: 82D

Tensile Strength: 6,700

Flex Modulus: 274,000

Min. Wall Thickness: .250”

RIM Processing Equipment – Dispensing Machine and Hydraulic Press

The RIM molding process begins with polymer liquids (polyol and isocyanate) stored in large storage tanks and dispensed by large, high-pressure industrial pumps. The polymers are recirculated from the storage tanks to a multi-stream mix-head on the machined aluminum mold and back to the storage tanks in a continuous loop.

Play Button

Advantages of a Polyurethane Reaction Injection Molding Process

From customers and end users alike, your products are going to get a better reaction. Watch our video to learn more!

The RIM molding process begins with polymer liquids (polyol and isocyanate) stored in large storage tanks and dispensed by large, high-pressure industrial pumps. The polymers are recirculated from the storage tanks to a multi-stream mix-head on the machined aluminum mold and back to the storage tanks in a continuous loop.

When each part is made, a piston or plunger inside the mix-head retracts, breaking the continuous loop, and the polymers then mix or impinge at a high velocity – approximately 1200 psi – to ensure the proper mixture of the polymers. The resulting polyurethane enters the mold (polyurethane injection molding process) through the after-mixer, which maintains the mixture’s properties while reducing its velocity to 95-100 psi.

Reaction Injection Molding not only offers significant advantages over injection molding, but also vacuum-forming, pressure-forming, and cast molding.
The admittedly longer production time of reaction injection molding is more than offset by its benefits to design, flexibility, and cost-efficiency, not to mention the wide ranges of part size, design uniqueness, and overall superiority.

Reaction Injection Molding (RIM) vs Other Processes

Comparison gives us a very positive reaction.

Reaction injection molding has many benefits: low tooling costs, short lead-times, large lightweight parts, high tolerances, enhanced design finish, desired chemical resistance properties, 94V-0 and HB ratings, customizing part properties, and molding over metal, wood, glass, computer chips and other parts.

Reaction injection molding is generally most cost-effective for the production of a few hundred to several thousand parts, but one RIM Manufacturing client has looked to us to produce more than 1,000,000 parts per year for 10 years.

RIM Process VS. Injection Molding

RIM Process Advantages

  1. Large, lightweight parts
  2. Varying wall thickness with no sink
  3. Deep draw
  4. Can combine multiple designed parts into one part within a single mold
  5. Low-to-moderate cost tooling – machined aluminum
  6. Short lead-time
  7. Tooling can be used for prototype and easily modified for production parts
  8. Material flexibility – elastomers, solid RIM, structural foam, flexible foam, DCPD, etc.
  9. Encapsulation of component materials including metals, electronics, plastic, valves, circuitry, etc.
  10. Low-to-high production volume
  11. Tight tolerances

Injection Molding

  1. Small-to-mid size parts
  2. Requires uniform wall thickness
  3. Limited draw
  4. Multiple mid-size parts generally require multiple molds
  5. High-cost tooling – steel
  6. Long lead-time
  7. Prototypes require different tooling and tooling modifications are expensive
  8. Limited material options
  9. Limited encapsulation
  10. Moderate-to-high production volume
  11. Tight tolerances

RIM Process VS. Thermoforming & Vacuum Forming

RIM Process Advantages

  1. Complex geometry and cosmetically appealing parts
  2. Deep draw with structural integrity
  3. Varied wall thickness throughout the part
  4. Structural integrity molded into parts
  5. Molded-in attachment points
  6. Tight tolerances
  7. Low-to-moderate cost tooling
  8. Low-to-moderate production
  9. Material flexibility – elastomers, solid RIM, structural foam, flexible foam, DCPD
  10. Encapsulation of component materials including metals, electronics, plastic, valves, circuitry, etc.

Thermoforming & Vacuum Forming

  1. Simple part design and geometry
  2. Draw limited and requires post-molding structural features
  3. Requires uniform wall thickness
  4. Post-molding gluing of ribs
  5. Glued attachment points
  6. Low-to-moderate cost tooling
  7. Limited material flexibility
  8. No encapsulation capability

RIM Process VS. Cast Molding

RIM Process Advantages

  1. Cosmetically appealing parts right out of the mold
  2. Prototype tooling can be used for production parts
  3. Tight consistent part tolerances
  4. Variable wall thickness without sink
  5. Tooling lasts the lifetime of the project
  6. Short lead-time on tooling

Cast Molding

  1. Cosmetic inconsistencies of parts off the mold
  2. Prototype and production tooling are different
  3. Part tolerance varies from part to part
  4. Variable wall thickness generally includes sink
  5. Short lead-time on tooling

RIM Process VS. Sheet Metal

RIM Process Advantages

  1. Tremendous design flexibility
  2. Large and light-weight parts
  3. Structurally strong and durable
  4. Molding in color an in-mold painting
  5. Variable wall thickness within the same part
  6. Affordable part cost
  7. Capable of combining multiple parts into one integrated part
  8. Provide sound and vibration insulation
  9. Corrosion and rust-resistant
  10. Part cost is more stable

Sheet Metal

  1. Limited design flexibility
  2. Parts are heavy
  3. Post-painting required
  4. High part cost
  5. Varied wall thickness requires welding multiple parts
  6. Multiple parts require labor and assembly costs
  7. Structurally stronger parts
  8. Part pricing is less stable due to the commodity’s market

RIM Process VS. Die Casting

RIM Process Advantages

  1. Lower weight
  2. Higher tolerances
  3. Greater design freedom
  4. No brittle parts
  5. Net shape with no machining
  6. Corrosion-resistance

Die Casting

  1. Low tooling cost
  2. Shorter lead-time
Injection Molding
Thermoforming & Vacuum Forming
Cast Molding
Sheet Metal
Die Casting
error: Content is protected !!